Posted by: africanpressorganization | 21 February 2013

IMF Executive Board Concludes 2012 Article IV Consultation with Namibia


 

 

IMF Executive Board Concludes 2012 Article IV Consultation with Namibia

 

WINDHOEK, Namibia, February 21, 2013/African Press Organization (APO)/ On February 8, 2013, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation with Namibia.1

Background

The Namibian economy bounced back strongly from the 2008–09 financial crises but growth slowed to about 5 percent in 2011 (just below the average for its peer Middle Income Countries group) compared with 6½ percent in 2010 due to contraction in the mining sector. The strong performance of the primary sector led to a rebound in growth in the second quarter of 2012. Mineral exports are, however, expected to decelerate in the last half of 2012 due to the weak external economic environment and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth will likely moderate to 4 percent in 2012. Inflation rose significantly to 7¼ percent (year–on-year) at end-December 2011, but declined to 6 percent at end July 2012 with an uptick in September 2012 to 6¾ percent. The increasing trend reflects the impact of high oil prices and a substantial depreciation of the South African rand caused by the on-going industrial strikes in South Africa.

Conditions in the banking sector remain favorable. Private sector credit extension remained robust at 9¾ percent (year on year) at end-December 2011, although slightly below 10¾ percent reached at end-December 2010. Credit was driven by mortgage credit and rapid expansion of installment credit and overdraft facilities to consumers, which could potentially crowd out bank funding for productive economic sectors. Nonperforming loans fell to 1½ percent of total loans at end-December 2011, down from 2 percent at end-December 2010. With overdue loans also declining, the asset quality of the banking sector has remained satisfactory. While the aggregate financial indicators are broadly sound, potential sources of vulnerabilities to financial stability are emerging from the combination of property price buildup, commercial banks’ large exposure to the property market, the growing household indebtedness and the concentration of large institutional investors in bank funding.

Fiscal policy continues to be fairly expansionary. The overall fiscal deficit in FY2011/12 increased to about 8½ percent of GDP from about 5¾ percent of GDP in FY2010/11 driven largely by the government’s temporary Targeted Intervention Program for Employment and Economic Growth (TIPEEG) and the public sector wage increase. The fiscal deficit (excluding the cyclical component of Southern Africa Customs Union revenues) deteriorated significantly from about 2½ percent in FY2010/11 to about 6¼ percent in FY2011/12. Overall public debt increased significantly from 16¼ percent in FY2010/11 to 26½ percent in FY2011/12, including through Namibia’s debut Eurobond issuance of US$500 million in November 2011. More recently, the Namibia government issued an R850 million (US$95 million) 10-year bond in South Africa with a yield of 8.26 percent.

The external position weakened in 2011. Annual exports (in US dollar terms) grew by about 9 percent in 2011 compared to about 29 percent in 2010. The moderate export growth in 2011 was supported mainly by diamond exports (benefiting from stronger prices). Nonmineral exports, notably manufactured products, and food and live animals also held up. Imports grew faster at 14 percent, driven by expansionary fiscal policy which supported growth in both public consumption and public capital expenditure and eased monetary conditions in the domestic economy which boosted private consumption. As a result, the current account recorded deficit of about 1¾ percent of GDP in 2011 from a surplus of ¼ percent of GDP in 2010.

Executive Board Assessment

Executive Directors commended Namibia’s strong macroeconomic performance following the crisis. Medium-term prospects remain favorable although subject to downside risks from external and internal developments. Directors called for continued commitment to sound policies and structural reforms to build adequate policy buffers, preserve financial stability, foster stronger and inclusive growth, and reduce unemployment.

Directors agreed on the need for a tighter fiscal stance in order to rebuild policy buffers, including reserves, and support the peg to the South African rand. They encouraged the authorities to strengthen their fiscal framework by delinking the fiscal stance from volatile Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and mining revenues. This would reinforce the past policy of paying down debt when there are SACU windfalls.

Directors emphasized that improving the quality of spending will be key to maintaining fiscal sustainability and more broadly support economy-wide competitiveness. This will require implementing a prudent public sector wage policy, strengthening the financial viability of the state-owned enterprises, and minimizing the fiscal risks associated with the TIPEEG. Directors took positive note of the authorities’ plans to unwind the program and to focus on skills development going forward. To enhance revenues, they highlighted the need for broadening the tax base, improving tax administration, and streamlining tax expenditures. These reforms should be implemented in a manner that improves the predictability and simplicity of the tax system.

Directors welcomed that Namibia’s financial system is generally sound. Nevertheless, they underscored the need for increased vigilance to monitor potential vulnerabilities stemming from a sizeable concentration of lending to mortgages, property price buildup, growing household indebtedness, and the concentration of large institutional investors in bank funding. In this respect, Directors commended the Bank of Namibia for the recent macro-prudential measures that have been put in place to strengthen financial stability and called for expeditious adoption of stress testing techniques.

Directors welcomed the authorities’ development objectives, laid out in the recent National Development Plan. Given high income inequality and unemployment, they strongly supported the focus on fostering effective investment in education and health and enhancing financial inclusion. Directors also commended the recent launch of the Human Resource Development Council to address the skills mismatch in the labor market.

 

Namibia: Selected Economic Indicators, 2008-2013

(Annual percentage change, unless otherwise indicated)

 

    

2008

2009    2010    2011    2012 Est.    2013 Proj.

 

Real GDP

3.4    -1.1    6.6    4.8    4.0    4.2

CPI (end of period)

10.9    7.0    3.1    7.2    6.2    5.7

Overall fiscal deficit/surplus (percent of GDP)1/, 2/

2.1    -2.2    -5.7    -8.6    -3.9    -5.3

Public debt (percent of GDP) 1/

18.2    15.6    16.1    26.5    28.8    29.8

Broad money (end period)

10.2    3.6    9.8    4.3    11.0    10.3

Credit to the private sector (end period)

7.3    10.0    11.2    9.3    11.0    10.3

Current account balance (percent of GDP)

2.8    -0.4    0.3    -1.7    -0..6    -2.5

International reserves

                        

US$ millions

1394.7    1918.7    1380.1    1811.4    1878.0    1789.8

Months of imports of goods and services

3.4    4.1    2.6    3.3    3.1    3.0

Exchange rate (Namibia dollar/U.S. dollar, end of period)

9.3    7.4    7.1    8.1    …    …

 

Sources: Namibian authorities; and IMF staff estimates.

1/ Figures are for fiscal year, which begins April 1.

2/ Overall balance includes externally financed project spending (except for roads) that is not channeled through the state account.

1 Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country’s economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board. At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country’s authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm

 

SOURCE 

International Monetary Fund (IMF)


Categories

%d bloggers like this: