Towards a “Green Revolution” in Africa?
Transcript of press conference
May 2nd, 2008
“Towards a ‘Green Revolution’ in Africa?” is an Initiative of the Salzburg Global Seminar
(www.SalzburgGlobal.org), the Institute of Development Studies (www.ids.ac.uk), and the Future
Agricultures Consortium (www.future-agricultures.org). The following is the transcript of a press
conference held at the Salzburg Global Seminar in Salzburg, Austria on Friday, May 2. The press
conference was held in conjunction with the above-named event which gathered agricultural and
economic experts to explore new opportunities and critical challenges to fostering a ‘uniquely
African Green Revolution.’
Edward MORTIMER: I am Edward Mortimer the vice president of the Salzburg Global
Seminar, and we are speaking to you from Salzburg in Austria, and we have a panel of
speakers at this remote press conference, in that I will ask them to introduce themselves,
starting with Kofi Annan who probably needs no introduction but he is, amongst other
things, the chairman of the Alliance for a Green revolution in Africa, AGRA. Mr. Annan.
Kofi ANNAN: I think I have already been introduced as Kofi Annan, the chairman of
AGRA, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa.
Akin ADESINA: My name is Akin Adesina. I am the vice president of the Alliance for a
Green Revolution in Africa.
Baba DIOUM: My name is Baba Dioum, general coordinator of the Conference of West
and Central Africa Ministers of Agriculture in 20 countries, and by the meantime lead
institution of the (inaudible).
Mamadou GOITA: My name is Mamadou Goita. I’m from an organisation called
IRPAD Afrique in Mali, and the member of the coalition COPAGEN. This is the
coalition to protect the (inaudible) in West Africa.
Agnes KALIBATA: My name is Agnes Kalibata. I’m the state minister of Agriculture
for Rwanda.
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much and before we answer your questions, I
think Mr. Annan has a few opening remarks.
2
Kofi ANNAN: Good afternoon, Ladies and Gentlemen and dear friends. I am speaking to
you from Salzburg, Austria, on the last day of an important conference. For the last two
days, experts from many parts of Africa, with friends from other parts of the world, have
been debating the theme “Towards a Green Revolution in Africa?” I think no question is
more important for the future of our continent, and that is why last year I agreed to
become Chairman of AGRA – the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa.
Of course at this time of rising food prices and widespread hunger the most urgent task is
to get food to the people who desperately need it now. I welcome President Bush’s
announcement last night, and especially the fact that he is offering not only food aid but
also money for agricultural development in Africa. I very much hope that governments
here in Europe will follow suit.
But no one should think that once that is done they can sit back and relax. Humanitarian
aid must be only the first prong of a three-pronged strategy. The second prong, for the
medium term, must be a pro-poor approach to raising productivity and food security in
Africa. And the third – which will take much longer, but that’s precisely why we need to
start on it now – is to enable African farmers to dramatically increase their output, so that
Africa can feed itself and not be dependent on food aid. That is what the Green
Revolution is all about.
It’s also much easier said than done you will say, and it is vital we get it right. We need
to learn from past mistakes, and we need to listen to all voices – voices from African
governments, from researchers, from civil society, from the private sector, from donors,
from regional and international organizations, and above all from African farmers
themselves.
That is what we have been doing these last two days, thanks to the Salzburg Global
Seminar, the Institute of Development Studies and the Future Agricultures Consortium.
They have brought together a remarkable group of people, some of whom are with me at
this table. They have introduced themselves already and now we will try to answer your
questions. Thank you.
Edward MORTIMER: Right, well, we had a number of people on the line and we have
one journalist present in the room with us from the Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher
Zeitung, and we have also – many questions were sent in in advance by e-mail. And there
is one question which I would like to put first to Kofi Annan because it was sent by so
many people, and that is that is this: What is new about AGRA? What does it propose
that was not done before and which can really turn around the agricultural situation in
Africa? In what ways does AGRA expect to help improve the food production chain in
Africa? Mr. Annan.
Kofi ANNAN: Thank you, Edward, for that question. I think one thing AGRA has done
is to acknowledge that you have to work along the value chain. That we need to work
with Africans to ensure they breed of a right see they need, that they to improve their
soils, and we are working with them on both, and we intend to work on what
management and irrigation and food processing and marketing. So, we will work with
the farmer to get his produce from the farm gate to the market. We are working with
African scientists, training as many scientists as possible, to ensure that they can breed
the right seats, and that they can work their soils. We will be working directly with the
3
farmers themselves, and particularly the women farmers who produce of the food on the
continent. I am not implying we will ignore the governments. We will work with the
governments because they have a role to play. We would encourage them to come up
with the right policies, pro-poor policies and policies that encourage rural development. I
think this approach is workable and we’re not going to be doing it alone. We are open to
all those who share our mission, and we’re going to work with other partners within
Africa and without.
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much. Well, we have one member of an
African government also on the panel: Ms. Kalibata and perhaps she would like to
respond to what Kofi Annan has just said? Or to the question? If, well, if she would like.
Okay, she wants to parts for now. Does any other member of the panel which to
comment on this opening question? Eh, yes, Mr. Dioum.
Baba DIOUM: yes, I think that Africa is in a big turn due to many things happening
together, particularly the heads of state five years ago decided themselves to take the lead
and the leadership to define their own agenda. This is very new – to open their minds and
their spirits to collaborate with the rest of the world by a partnership. And also to
recognize that states themselves cannot achieve this. They say that the private sector,
civil society have to be on board really and to work with them. This is very new, this is a
new approach in Africa. It is why we are happy to be here and to be very inclusive with
this initiative of AGRA. We think that we can speak of achieving what the heads of state
have decided a few years ago.
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much. And now I think it is the turn of Mr
Thomas Botner from the Neue Zürcher Zeitung. If you could come to the podium and ask
your question please.
Thomas BOTNER: thank you very much. This is an honour for me to speak first. I
have two different questions. First, as a Swiss, I would be interested if there is a
connection with you the global a humanitarian forum which is located in Geneva, and the
second question is, what about what do you think about the microcredit system as it is
installed for instance in Bangladesh. These are my two questions. Thank you very much.
Edward MORTIMER: so the first question clearly is for Kofi Annan.
Kofi ANNAN: Yes, I will take the first one. In a way the global humanitarian forum in
Geneva is focused, at least for this year and next, on the impact of climate change on
communities and individuals. And this directly links up with agriculture. We have
talked about the impact of climate change on agricultural production, changing brain
patterns, long droughts, making formerly fertile lands unploughable. We have seen how
deserts expand at a rate of 7 km per year. All this has impacted on agricultural
productivity. And if we do not take measures, serious adaptation measures, we will even
lose a little gains that we have made (unintelligible) to meet the millennium goals, or we
will see degradation in African agriculture. So whatever we do has to be sustainable. We
need to bear mind impact of climate change, we need to be able to adapt, to be able to
4
sustain our efforts, and what the forum is doing in Geneva is to help build capacity in
these vulnerable countries so that you increase the resilience and reduce the vulnerability
of the people for them to be able to maintain their livelihood. So we come in, not only on
the issue of adaptation but also insisting on sustainable development.
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much. Would anyone want to answer the
question about microcredit? Madame Kalibata, from the government of Rwanda.
Agnes KALIBATA: Thank you. The question on microcredit is extremely important,
especially when we look at where we are going with the Green Revolution. The issue of
inputs becomes extremely important. The increasing prices of inputs that we have seen
today, inputs, especially fertilisers have more than have increased by five times more as
last year. So farmers who are accessing fertilisers last year have to pay five times as
much to put fertilisers in the same piece of land to produce the same amount of food that
they produced last year. Then in terms of seeds, too, production of seeds involves
investment in terms of (inaudible) stuff like that, still we need to be helping farmers
accessing seeds through us, to access credit. Another thing the Green Revolution
(inaudible) and this will increase microcredit systems to farmers. Thank you.
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much. Another question that was sent in by
many journalists in Africa was: are you afraid that the food prices will spur new conflicts
in African countries? And if so is the food crisis likely to pose obstacles to your plan?
Mr Annan would you like to have a first go at that?
Kofi ANNAN: We have already seen demonstrations around the world, because of the
food prices and the food crisis. I think it is important that we take urgent measures to
ensure that those who need the food get it. And that is why I am very encouraged by the
generous offers of governments from President Bush and other European leaders to offer
of the resources needed by the world food programme to continue this programme and to
acquire food at the new higher prices that we have seen. I think governments may also be
able to reduce some of the tariffs and take measures internally to make food available to
the poor. If we tackle the humanitarian emergency as effectively as we should and take
measures of the medium to the longer term, to ensure forward security in Africa, and
make a sustained effort to bring about a green revolution, I think that the current crisis,
need not to make the current situation worse, in fact, it could be an opportunity for all of
us to focus on an urgent task that we have ignored far too long.
Edward MORTIMER: I think Madame Kalibata would like to comment on that
question as well.
Agnes KALIBATA: yes, I think, like, the secretary general has said, I think this is a
great opportunity. One, because I think that in Africa and most of the food crisis that has
been talked about really should not be a case in point for Africa today. But it is going to
be next year, and the year after because whatever is happening in terms of biofuel and
stuff like that hasn’t really been happening here. What has been happening is that we
have probably been affected by whatever inputs are coming to Africa. But in terms of
5
production it should probably – nothing should have changed. What needs to be done is
to take these and ensure that we produce to take care of whatever is coming in as food aid
or inputs. So it’s an opportunity for people to get to import and increase whatever is
needed in terms of inputs and (inaudible) systems to make sure that food prices does not
become a bigger problem in Africa. There is a potential for that to happen, if we don’t
something about it.
Edward MORTIMER: Mr. Mamadou Goita who has worked with small farmers’
organisations, particularly in Mali.
Mamadou GOITA: Yes, I would like to talk a bit about this food crisis because people
are really mixing some of the points. I’m concerned about it because I know there are
problems with food issues in Africa. But the marches are beyond the issue of food. All
the marches that have been organised now are on different things. They are marching for
better salaries, there are marching for oil prices going up in the countries, so they want to
take out taxes and all these things, and also for food prices. So when we restrict it to only
food problem, I think that is a mistake because that is really giving just one part of the
problem. So this is the point I wanted to make. And the second thing is that people also
having these marches in different cities because of the prices of rights, in most of the
cases, and wheat. If you take the African context, this is really related to big cities,
mainly, because these are two crops that are mainly used at city level. Coming from a
country like Mali, but also having contact with West African countries, in my own case,
eating a lot of millet in my family and so on, I am not affected. I am not affected because
farmers form, I am working with they don’t even have a (inaudible) price for the millet.
So talking about prices-we have to talk, just where of the problem is. So this will lead us
to go behind this simplified way of talking about food crisis. Habit will have changed at
city level, so people are now eating more rise, more wheat with bread and so and so forth,
so it’s an opportunity for us in the case of Mali, because of those of us living in the city’s
fighting just to get better salaries and having access to (inaudible) and so and so forth, the
government has decided to put 47 billion CFA next year for this production. It’s a good
thing. But we say that this is just tackling the problem on a crisis basis, but we need
(inaudible) on a structural basis. So I really want to talk about this because it is really
important. (Inaudible) of these marches are not only for food. So when we talk about
food riots we are exaggerating things to my concern. Thank you.
Edward MORTIMER: Dr Adesina, you want to add something?
Akin ADESINA: Yes. I think we should also realise that the current food crisis – we’re
calling it crisis because for the first time there are people on the streets in the cities. But
Africa has always had food crises. There has been a silent hunger going on in Africa of
the last 30 years, and per capita production of food has been declining for the last 30
years. It’s just been affecting the rural folks. So we should realise that that silent hunger
has been there and Africa is one region where it is projected that we are not going to be
able to reach MDG goal one, to end poverty and hunger are because of that low
productivity of agriculture. So that’s really way of the crisis years. That’s where it bites.
It bites and those the supposed to be producing food-farmers, but they can’t even produce
6
enough for themselves much less sell the food to others. So that’s one point. Second one
is, as Mr Annan pointed out, this doesn’t have to be something that leads into civil crisis
but in fact some of that can lead to new opportunities. Remember though, in Asia in the
70s, when the Asian Green Revolution happened, there were the same set of factors: the
price of energy was very high, global food supply was very very low, and the price of
rice was so high that you had rice riots all across Asia. But that’s what pushed the Asian
governments to invest more in agricultural research that led to a green revolution. So we
are hoping that the African governments would see that as an opportunity to invest more
in agriculture, raise agricultural productivity, and get a Green Revolution that would
really address this problem at its roots.
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much. The correspondent from Radio France
International?
RFI Correspondent: Which forms of aid are most appropriate for which countries?
Baba DIOUM: (translation) I’ve seen this crisis manifest itself in several countries. On
the streets you can watch it it, it’s there. And tomorrow and the day after tomorrow there
will be more countries who demonstrate in the same fashion. In any case, the first
measures that have been taken, and that will impact on future agricultural development, is
a reduction in tax on imports. Perhaps tomorrow this will impact on (inaudible) the state
budget which cannot subsidise (food) at the expense of other items. But what really
worries me is that this urgency obscures something very basic and fundamental. If, as Mr
Annan said, we do not know whether this crisis will change our policies, accelerate the
process, then we’re going to lose the battle against hunger. And that’s where I think there
is an opportunity.
Edward MORTIMER: O.K. Let me read a question which has been sent in by Beatrice
Kemunto from The Nation in Kenya. And she – I think it was addressed to AGRA: Have
you set yourselves specific objectives by which success can be judged, for example, have
you got a time frame within which you want to achieve some level of food security or
progress in the same line? So I will ask Mr Annan to answer that first but maybe others
will have comments on how they would judge whether the Green Revolution is
succeeding or not.
Kofi ANNAN: I would want Adesina to deal with that question, but let me say the way
the question is drafted it implies that all the responsibility lies on AGRA. AGRA is a
partner and is going to work with African governments and African farmers to make it
happen and with other partners. I think that success will depend on how seriously we
take this effort, and how we sustain this effort. And I believe that if we all take it
seriously and work in a sustained manner then the approach we have tried to define – I
think we will succeed and we should be able in my judgement to double or triple food
production by the African farmers in a period of five to 10 years. But at least we should
be able to do that. Akin, do you want to add something?
7
Akin ADESINA: Mr. Annan mentioned in his remarks yesterday at the opening of the
conference that talk is cheap. And I think in Africa both at the continental level, the
African heads of state through the (inaudible) programme and the NEPAD programme
political support, and also at AGRA level, we think that it’s time to move processes to
action. So you can only have success, if you are actually having action. So AGRA and its
partners are going to be action driven. We think that success needs to be measured in
terms of the number of farmers that you see using improved varieties of seeds and able to
significantly raise the productivity of their food crops (inaudible) children improve their
nutrition because their parents are able to produce more food and more nutritious food for
themselves. We will be able to measure it in terms of the income that farmers are able to
get because they are able to now have more to sell (inaudible) and also requirements.
Now, these of course cannot be done tomorrow. But we believe that with the work of
AGRA our partners we are working hard to produce varieties of crops that that applicable
to different geographical zones of Africa that farmers are benefiting from right now; we
are working on integrated soil fertility strategies that are helping farmers to raise
productivity and we are developing markets to assist them as well. So we think that in
the next five to 10 years you will see significant changes in Africa but if you go out right
now. You would not even begin to see that (inaudible) farmer feel. So these are very
clear indicators that I think we should all measure ourselves by.
Edward MORTIMER: Well, I’d be interested to know what Mr. Goita thinks about that
from this perspective of small farmers on the ground in west Africa.
Mamadou GOITA: Yes, I cannot say if there is any framework for assessing AGRA
right now because I’m not directly involved in the process but what I can say is that there
are conditions for the sustainability of this initiative. The first one is bringing on board
small-scale farmers. This is one condition because we know that the majority of
producers in Africa are small-scale farmers. I’m not talking about South Africa and other
countries where you have big producers. You take the case of my country. We have about
8% of the population working on the farm issues – agriculture, cattle breeding, fishing,
and so forth. And out of these more than 90% are small-scale farmers. And if these
people are not involved in the process, not just been consulted about giving them
responsibility on the issue, for me there is no way, it cannot work. And the second thing
is the content of the different actions that will be taken because of the sustainability of
some of these things have already been assessed. We’re talking about bringing fertilizers
to farmers. There is a lot to think about because we already have experience with cotton,
with peanuts in Senegal, Mali, Benin and Burkina Faso. Once you have opportunity for
farmers to get annexes to fertilizers, because they have to renew the process, and if the
funding system stops, usually the process will also stop. So there is a lot to think about
that. When you bring these kinds of input to them how wicked we sustain the process of
the funding system to allow these small scale farmers to continuously have access to it.
And that’s why I say, look, there are other opportunities also, other things that need to be
taken into account. This is what they are doing now in terms of soil fertility issues but
also in terms of water management system that is sustainable. So, there is a lot of
conditions that we need to think about and the other structural issues, because this is also
the kind of blockage we have between some types of research being done by research
8
institutes, and farmers doing research is a participatory process. So these are some of the
conditions. We may have others much to make it short. So if farmers in the process of
having a leadership on it. Secondly, the different elements that of the green revolution is
including is water management, the use of water, the use of fertilizers, and the use of
hybrid seeds. And if this system is based on a system that we know, on Green
Revolution, it will be a problem. So sustainability is also assessed in terms of
accountability, in terms of transparency, in terms of implications for farmers in the
process.
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much. I think Mr. Dioum wants to make a
comment.
Baba DIOUM: In (inaudible) process a major issue is accountability and how we make
it. We set up all the process of benchmarking and monitoring and evaluation. And we
have criteria to measure very frequently what kind of progress we made on the
commitment in Maputo about the 10% budget allocation, but also on the 6% growth. This
allows us now to really set up a mechanism with our partners, what we call the peer
review mechanism, meeting every six months to measure what progress has been made.
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much. Well, Mr Annan is going to have to leave
us in a moment but I would like to put one question to him before he leaves, which was
sent in by Jeffery Mbanga from the Weekly Observer in Uganda. And the question is:
does the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa embrace the use of genetically
modified foods as a measure to counter the current food crisis?
Kofi ANNAN: Let me say that today were using conventional breeding efforts to
improve seeds and to be able to help farmers. We believe that working with the farmers
this approach we will be able to increase food production. Of course the issue of GMO is
not going to go away because AGRA has a different approach. As we move forward, that
debate will continue. Research on GMOs is continuing around the world and it cannot be
stopped. It is possible that down the line African governments may decide to adopt
GMOs. For the moment, most African governments have not taken that decision I’m sure
there would be organizations and institutions ready to work with them. AGRA is using
conventional breeding at the moment. Thank you.
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much and I’m sorry that you have to leave us
now. If the other members of the panel are willing to stay for a few minutes, I still have
quite a few questions that have been sent in. Here is one actually from the Ghana News
Agency. Nate Glover-Meni says: some major problems soil management, lack of storage
facilities, lack of farming technology. Also, a high yielding seeds alone are not the
answer unless farmers are educated about the use of technology, farming practices and
processing. Finally, stable markets are important. How does AGRA intend to make sure
that its objectives all come together? Perhaps Dr. Adesina you could say something about
that?
9
Akin ADESINA: The Green Revolution is most focused on the farmers, the small
farmers and the use of knowledge is critical to that. We must also recognize that farmers
have their own local knowledge, their own indigenous knowledge, so it’s not a question
of trying to bring new knowledge to farmers. We must deal with what farmers already
know. And this is very important in Africa because the archaeological zones in Africa are
very diverse, the crops are many and the food preferences are so different. So at the end
of the day it is the small farmer (inaudible) that can best decide where to plant that
variety. Whether to apply fertilizer or not. How much to apply on it. And so on. So we
really cannot make decisions for those farmers, they have to make those decisions. When
it comes to how all these things come together on the ground, it is again the countries that
have to make these things happen. AGRA works with governments, with the private
sector, with civil society organisations at country level to implement their own
programmes. AGRA doesn’t have any programme different from what the government
wants us to support. And so own way of working is to say we need to focus on
breadbasket areas. These are vast areas of Africa where, if you have the right kind of
seed, the right kind of soil fertility practices, you have irrigation and good roads and
market access, we can double, triple, and in some cases quadruple production now. But
we have to focus on those areas where the opportunities are. So at the country level,
where you are saying there is no scarce resources, focus on breadbasket areas. Bring the
markets, the seat, the soil fertility, the irrigation, everything together in an area where you
have a good infrastructure so that you can really push production, don’t disperse
resources everywhere.
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much. And now a question from Dorothy
Nakaweesi of The Monitor in Uganda. And she asks: how does the Green Revolution
plan to address land rights, especially in a country like Uganda, where she says, the
women till the land but have no say over it. Well, Dr. Kalibata you spent part of your life
in Uganda and you are the only woman on this panel so you might have some news on
this question, I think.
Agnes KALIBATA: Thank you but I will not speak for AGRA… (laughs)
Edward MORTIMER: No, this is the Green Revolution, it cannot be confined to
AGRA.
Agnes KALIBATA: … o.k., o.k., the issue of land rights is extremely important when it
comes to how agriculture is done. We have taken a decision in Rwanda that they has to
be equal rights to land irrespective of gender. So this land bias that is not allowing most
of the population that is tilling the land to have rights to the land is something that really
needs to be worked on. And the land is telling system is extremely important in raising
agricultural productivity. Basically with people and the willingness to invest in the land
and the amount of investment you going to put into land is direct related to whether you
own this land or whether you are renting it. so I would encourage people to start thinking
about equitable land rights. Thank you.
10
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much. Mr. Fletcher, the Reuter correspondent in
West Africa, if he is still on the line, would he like to ask a question?
FLETCHER: I would like to ask a question to Mr. Annan directly.
Edward MORTIMER: Well Mr. Annan is no longer with us, but he has asked Dr.
Adesina, who is the Vice President of AGRA, to answer any remaining questions on his
behalf. So please go ahead and put your question.
FLETCHER: Okay, well I would basically like to ask whether (inaudible) we’ve been
hearing from the international community since the beginning of the year and that there is
a deficit in funding for food aid for WFP. In that time, we have seen US and European
central banks provide billions, billions of dollars to ease the credit crunch that the effects
of the sub prime crisis. Yet we don’t seem to have filled the deficit for food aid of 750
million as I understand it for the WFP. So does the panel think that the urgency as they
are for the international community to respond to this crisis?
Edward MORTIMER: Akin?
Akin ADESINA: Yes. Clearly we have a situation where there are so many of the poor
in developing countries that are negatively affected by the current food crisis. We
households spend 60-70% of their incomes on food. And so you know, when somebody
is hungry, they become very angry. And so you can understand why you have to solve
that problem first in the immediate sense. You cannot have peace on an empty stomach.
But the amount of resources that are going to be needed to allow Africa to significantly
raise agricultural productivity in the medium and in the long-term are quite significant.
So the donor community shouldn’t think that because the current despite goes away, then
the problem is over. No. A large amount of funding will be needed in Africa for
agricultural research, for agricultural extension, for seed systems production, markets
development, for building infrastructure, roads, storage facilities that are going to be
required. Green Revolution cannot happen on the cheap, we can’t do this on a shoestring
budget. So we are asking that we are not losing perspective on the long-term that the
world is listening and that there will be significant support to allow African countries
achieve their much needed green revolution.
Edward MORTIMER: Well thank you. I find that I might ask a follow-up question to
Mr. Fletcher’s. Kofi Annan said at the beginning that he hoped that Europe would follow
Bush’s lead in promising increased aid for agricultural development in Africa. What we
actually see in Europe at the moment are debates with many governments seeking to
reduce for budgetary reasons the amount of money they have pledged to provide for
development, and I think we are nowhere near the famous Gleneagles commitments.
Maybe Dr. Kalibata, you would have a comment on that. No? Well, Mr. Dioum.
Baba DIOUM: Yes, or as far as let’s say more money is concerned, it’s really a very big
time now as they say. The world now sees that stability is really linked to the
development. Instability is linked to poverty. Do we think that sitting somewhere in
11
OECD countries we are in a good position when people in Africa are hungry? This is
another issue. We have to look it through. Now the global village as we say, is there.
These boats coming from Africa drawing young people in Europe due to what? Just lack
of development. Please invest, not just like business as usual. But take the global world as
your global world. Invest where (inaudible) have to make their own development to be
free. This is very important. I think that money is necessary, but also the technology is
necessary. How people can use in the best way the money they got. This is also very
important. Because we cannot make development just by giving money, no, we have to
train people, educate them, give them the opportunity to make business in their own
country. We have to develop our regional markets. This is a very big issue that we have
to face now.
Edward MORTIMER: But all of that costs money.
Baba DIOUM: Yes.
Edward MORTIMER: Mr. Goita.
Mamadou GOITA: I think this is not new what he is talking about – Europe or the US
promising things and not doing it, this is not new. What is new is the way that things are
happening. Of course we can talk a lot about this so this is not the time for that. Because
if you go fine to the histories of the 80s – why African agriculture is in that stage today.
So we need to ask this question. If we ask this question, we can learn from the past
because most of the foundations that are involved in the current process have already
invested a lot in African agriculture, theoretically – I’m talking about (in audible),
foundation for instance in my country and all these things, but things have not changed.
That is one thing we need to talk about. When they talk about technical assistance,
human resources, it is the key thing for agriculture. In the 80s, with adjustment
programs, we stopped all the assistance, technical assistance to farmers because of the
World Bank. And even teachers’ schools have been closed. So this is another issue but I
want to talk about food assistance …
Edward MORTIMER: Quickly please because we’re running out of time.
Mamadou GOITA: So that’s one point. Yes, the US government had decided to put, I
think if I remember very rightly, $200 million on food aid, of food aid to Africa. So it’s a
tricky thing. Because the knows that, at any time, that such situation happen in Africa,
you know, production is going down, because it will destroy the production system.
Secondly, people will be used to some type of product that they are not used to. This
happens to many of the (inaudible) countries in the past and $200 million of food aid in
the continent this year, and we all know that last seasons most of that countries had extra
production in cereals. We talk about Mali. We talk about Niger. We talk about Burkina
Faso. They all had extra production of food. Statistic will show and this is the reality. So
in this context there are riots about many other things and you bring $200 million of food
in the continent, this is destroying the system that is in place.
12
Edward MORTIMER: Adesina.
Akin ADESINA: I would like to say that we’re actually witnessing a good trend, a
development that we should not lose sight of. There was the World Bank Development
Report 2008 which brought the importance of agriculture back onto the development
agenda. And we think, in AGRA, that is a very very positive development. The president
of the World Bank also announced recently that the Bank will be increasing its support
for Africa from $400 million to $800 million next year. We think that’s a very significant
very important development. And President Bush also announced in terms of new aid
coming in. So those are very significant developments. So we should work on these
developments. We also realised that Africans themselves are putting up money, they are
not just going saying ‘give us more money’. The African heads of state agreed to increase
the share of their total budget in agriculture to 10%. Many of them are already meeting
those targets they agreed to in their Maputo Declarations. Now I am from Nigeria, and
we have a proverb that says that it is the baby that opens its hand that you actually carry.
What am trying to say is that African governments themselves are trying to do a lot and
they open their hands so they deserve support for us to succeed. Now what the African
governments or are saying and what we would like to also emphasize is: help us to
produce our own food. Being able to produce food in Africa is a matter of dignity. It is a
matter of national security. And therefore any support that is given to Africa is helping
African farmers and governments to feed their people with dignity, and everybody wants
that. So I think it’s very important for the world development community to honour the
commitments they have made. But more than ever that this is the time to act on resources
for African agriculture.
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much. And for the last word I turn to Agnes
Kalibata from the government of Rwanda.
Agnes KALIBATA: Thank you. In short, I would like to say what came out of this
clearly food crisis in Africa has been there at the household level. At the country level
food crisis will happen in the next few years, beginning next year if we don’t do anything
about it. Because, like I said before, the price of inputs, the price of seeds and fertilizers,
the price of fuel (inaudible) indicated that are going to all the other things that are
important in getting food to the table have all gone up. So if we continue doing business
as usual in Africa, if we don’t pay attention to the fact that an increase in seeds and
fertilisers is necessary in the coming years, we will definitely have a bigger food crisis,
actually a national food crisis. So it will move from the household to the national level.
We need to be doing something about it. Thank you.
Edward MORTIMER: Thank you very much. So thank you from the Salzburg Global
Seminar and goodbye.









